Possibly my ideal (or possibly worst) quality is that I'm totally disappointed with my own understanding.

This might be the reason I've shown a certain skill for maths and physics. Simply understanding is never ever sufficient for me; I have to at least attempt to rigorously understand the reasoning behind the maths I do, and then, take my understanding to its limitations. Profusely asking why something is the way it is, perhaps to the nuisance of my lecturers, is something I'm urged to do. I, along with numerous others, find this Socratic method of learning and also training to be exceptionally useful in building an essential understanding of mathematics and physics from basic concepts, as well as I endeavour to educate in precisely this fashion.

I hope I could encourage trainees with my intense love of mathematics and physics or, at least, disclose the topics as far less challenging compared to they show up. Naturally not everybody is a mathematician, and different minds discover at various paces, nonetheless I will aim to leave an enduring and advantageous impression.